Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
EXHIBIT 11.1 Bed Bath & Beyond January–February 57.50 calendar.
|
||||
The only point on the diagram that is drawn with definitive accuracy is
|
||||
the maximum loss to the downside at expiration of the January call. The
|
||||
maximum loss if Bed Bath & Beyond falls low enough is 0.80—the debit
|
||||
paid for the spread. If Bed Bath & Beyond is below $57.50 at January
|
||||
expiration, the January 57.50 call expires worthless, and the February 57.50
|
||||
call may or may not have residual value. If Bed Bath & Beyond declines
|
||||
enough, the February 57.50 call can lose all of its value, even with residual
|
||||
time until expiration. If the stock falls enough, the entire 0.80 debit would
|
||||
be a loss.
|
||||
If Bed Bath & Beyond is above $57.50 at January expiration, the January
|
||||
57.50 call will be trading at parity. It will be a negative-100-delta option,
|
||||
imitating short stock. If Bed Bath & Beyond is trading high enough, the
|
||||
February 57.50 call will become a positive-100-delta option trading at
|
||||
parity plus the interest calculated on the strike. The February deep-in-the-
|
||||
money option would imitate long stock. At a 2 percent interest rate, interest
|
||||
on the 57.50 strike is about 0.17. Therefore, Richard would essentially have
|
||||
a short stock position from $57.50 from the January 57.50 call and would
|
||||
be essentially long stock from $57.50 plus 0.28 from the February call. The
|
||||
maximum loss to the upside is about 0.63 (0.80 − 0.17).
|
||||
The maximum loss if Bed Bath & Beyond is trading over $57.50 at
|
||||
expiration is only an estimate that assumes there is no time value and that
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user