Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
Short Naked Puts
|
||||
Another trader, Stacie, has also been studying Johnson & Johnson. Stacie
|
||||
believes Johnson & Johnson is on its way to test the $65 resistance level yet
|
||||
again. She believes it may even break through $65 this time, based on
|
||||
strong fundamentals. Stacie decides to sell naked puts. A naked put is a
|
||||
short put that is not sold in conjunction with stock or another option.
|
||||
With the stock around $64, the market for the November 65 put is 1.75
|
||||
bid at 1.80. Stacie likes the fact that the 65 puts are slightly in-the-money
|
||||
(ITM) and thus have a higher delta. If her price rise comes sooner than
|
||||
expected, the high delta may allow her to take a profit early. Stacie sells 10
|
||||
puts at 1.75.
|
||||
In the best-case scenario, Stacie retains the entire 1.75. For that to happen,
|
||||
she will need to hold this position until expiration and the stock will have to
|
||||
rise to be trading above the 65 strike. Logically, Stacie will want to do an
|
||||
at-expiration analysis. Exhibit 5.4 shows Stacie’s naked put trade if she
|
||||
holds it until expiration.
|
||||
EXHIBIT 5.4 Naked Johnson & Johnson put at expiration.
|
||||
While harvesting the entire premium as a profit sounds attractive, if
|
||||
Stacie can take the bulk of her profit early, she’ll be happy to close the
|
||||
position and eliminate her risk—nobody ever went broke taking a profit.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user