Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
Chapter 25: LEAPS
|
||||
THE DELTA
|
||||
387
|
||||
The delta of an option is the amount by which the option price will change if the
|
||||
underlying stock changes in price by one point. In an earlier section of this chapter,
|
||||
comparing the differences between LEAPS and short-term calls, mention was made
|
||||
of delta. The subject is explored in more depth here because it is such an important
|
||||
concept, not only for option buyers, but for most strategic decisions as well.
|
||||
Figure 25-5 depicts the deltas of two different options: 2-year LEAPS and 3-
|
||||
month equity options. Their terms are the same except for their expiration dates; strik
|
||||
ing price is 100, and volatility and interest rate assumptions are equal. The horizontal
|
||||
axis displays the stock price while the vertical axis shows the delta of the options.
|
||||
Several relevant observations can be made. First, notice that the delta of the at
|
||||
the-money LEAPS is very large, nearly 0.70. This means that the LEAPS call will
|
||||
move much more in line with the common stock than a comparable short-term equi
|
||||
ty option would. Very short-term at-the-money options have deltas of about½, while
|
||||
slightly longer-term ones have deltas ranging up to the 0.55 to 0.60 area. What this
|
||||
implies is that the longer the life of an at-the-nwney option, the greater its delta.
|
||||
In addition, the figure shows that the deltas of the 3-month call and the 2-year
|
||||
LEAPS call are about equal when the options a~e approximately 5% in-the-money. If
|
||||
the options are more in-the-money than that, then the LEAPS call has a lower delta.
|
||||
This means that at- and out-of-the-money LEAPS will move more in line with the
|
||||
common stock than comparable short-term options will. Restated, the LEAPS calls
|
||||
will move faster than the ordinary short-term equity calls unless both options are
|
||||
more than 5% in-the-money. Note that the movement referred to is in absolute terms
|
||||
in change of price, not in percentage terms.
|
||||
The delta of the 2-year LEAPS does not change as dramatically when the
|
||||
stock moves as does the delta of the 3-month option (see Figure 25-5). Notice that
|
||||
the LEAPS curve is relatively flat on the chart, rising only slightly above horizon
|
||||
tal. In contrast, the delta of the 3-month call is very low out-of-the-money and very
|
||||
large in-the-money. What this means to the call buyer is that the amount by which
|
||||
he can expect the LEAPS call to increase or decrease in price is somewhat stable.
|
||||
This can affect his choice of whether to buy the in-the-money call or the out-of
|
||||
the-money call. With normal short-term options, he can expect the in-the-money
|
||||
call to much more closely mirror the movement in the stock, so he might be tempt
|
||||
ed to buy that call if he expects a small movement in the stock. With LEAPS, how
|
||||
ever, there is much less discrepancy in the amount of option price movement that
|
||||
will occur.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user