Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
170 Part II: Call Option Strategies
|
||||
When a spread order is entered, the options being bought and sold must be
|
||||
specified. Two other items must be specified as well: the price at which the spread is
|
||||
to be executed, and whether that price is a credit or a debit. If the total price of the
|
||||
spread results in a cash inflow to the spread strategist, the spread is a credit spread.
|
||||
This merely means that the sell side of the spread brings in a higher price than is paid
|
||||
for the buy side of the spread. If the reverse is true - that is, there is a cash outflow
|
||||
from the spread transaction - the spread is said to be a debit spread. This means that
|
||||
the buy side of the spread costs more than is received from the sell side. It is also
|
||||
common to refer to the purchased side of the spread as the long side and to refer to
|
||||
the written side of the spread as the short side.
|
||||
The price at which a certain spread can be executed is generally not the differ
|
||||
ence between the last sale prices of the two options involved in the spread.
|
||||
Example: An investor wants to buy an XYZ October 30 and simultaneously sell an
|
||||
XYZ October 35 call. If the last sale price of the October 30 was 4 points and the last
|
||||
sale price of the October 35 was 2 points, it does not necessarily mean that the spread
|
||||
could be done for a 2-point debit (the difference in the last sale prices). In fact, the
|
||||
only way to detennine the market price for a spread transaction is to know what the
|
||||
bid and asked prices of the options involved are. Suppose the following quotes are
|
||||
available on these two calls:
|
||||
October 30 call
|
||||
October 35 call
|
||||
Bid
|
||||
37/s
|
||||
F/s
|
||||
Asked
|
||||
41/s
|
||||
2
|
||||
Lost Sole
|
||||
4
|
||||
2
|
||||
Since the spread in question involves buying the October 30 call and selling the
|
||||
October 35, the spreader will, at market, have to pay 41/s for the October 30 ( the asked
|
||||
or offering quote) and will receive only F/s (the bid quote) for the October 35. This
|
||||
results in a debit of 2¼ points, significantly more than the 2-point difference in the
|
||||
last sale prices. Of course, one is free to specify any price he wants for any type of
|
||||
transaction. One might enter this spread order at a 21/s-point debit and could have a
|
||||
reasonable chance of having the order filled if the floor broker can do better than the
|
||||
bid side on the October 35 or better than the offering side on the October 30.
|
||||
The point to be learned here is that one cannot assume that last sale prices are
|
||||
indicative of the price at which a spread transaction can be executed. This makes
|
||||
computer analysis of spread transactions via closing price data somewhat difficult.
|
||||
Some computer data services offer (generally at a higher cost) closing bid and asked
|
||||
prices as well as closing sale prices. If a strategist is forced to operate with closing
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user