Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

This commit is contained in:
2025-12-23 21:17:22 -08:00
commit 619e87aacc
2140 changed files with 2513895 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
445
tHe COnCepts And MeCHAniCs OF spreAd trAding
shifts.) As a consequence of the intrinsic nature of this commodity, different months in live cattle are,
in a sense, different commodities. June live cattle is a very different commodity from december live
cattle. the price of each will be dependent on the markets perception of the supply-demand picture
that it expects to prevail at each given time period. it is not unusual for a key cattle on feed report to
carry bullish implications for near months and bearish connotations for distant months, or vice versa.
in such a case, the futures market can often react by moving in opposite directions for the near and
distant contracts. the key point is that in a bullish (bearish) situation, the market will sometimes view
the near-term supply/demand balance as being more bullish (bearish) and sometimes it will view the
distant situation as being more bullish (bearish). A similar behavioral pattern prevails in hogs.
thus,
the general rule would not apply in these types of markets.
in these markets, rather than being concerned about the overall price direction, the spread trader
is primarily concerned with how he thinks the market will perceive the fundamental situation in dif-
ferent time periods. For example, at a given point in time, June cattle and
december cattle may be
trading at approximately equal levels. if the trader believes that marketings will become heavy in the
months preceding the June expiration, placing pressure on that contract, and further believes the
market psychology will view the situation as temporary, expecting prices to improve toward year-
end, he would initiate a long
december/short June cattle spread. note that if he is correct in the
development of near-term pressure but the market expects even more pronounced weakness as time
goes on, the trade will not work even if his expectations for improved prices toward year-end also
prove accurate. One must always remember that a spreads life span is limited to the expiration of the
nearer month, and substantiation of the spread idea after that point will be of no benefit to the trader.
thus, the trader is critically concerned, not only with the fundamentals themselves, but also with the
markets perception of the fundamentals, which may or may not be the same.
■ Spread Rather Than Outright—An Example
Frequently, the volatility of a given market may be so extreme that even a one-contract position may
represent excessive risk for some traders.
in such instances, spreads offer the trader an alternative
approach to the market. For example, in early 2014, coffee futures surged dramatically, gaining more
than 75 percent from late January to early March, with average daily price volatility more than tri-
pling during that period.
prices swung wildly for the next several months—pushing to a higher high
in April, giving back more than half of the rally in the sell-off to the July low , and then rallying to yet
another new high in October (see Figure 30.1). At that juncture, assume a low-risk trader believed
that prevailing nearest futures prices near $2.22 in mid-October 2014 were unsustainable, but based
on the markets volatility (which was still around three times what it had been early in the year) and his
money management rules felt he could not assume the risk of an outright position.
such a trader could
instead have entered a bear spread (e.g., short July 2015 coffee/long december 2015 coffee) and
profited handsomely from the subsequent price slide. Figure 30.1 illustrates the close correspondence
between the spread and the market.
the fact that an outright position would have garnered a much
larger profit is an irrelevant consideration, since the traders risk limitations would have prevented him
from participating in the bear move altogether had his market view been confined to outright trades.