Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
445
|
||||
tHe COnCepts And MeCHAniCs OF spreAd trAding
|
||||
shifts.) As a consequence of the intrinsic nature of this commodity, different months in live cattle are,
|
||||
in a sense, different commodities. June live cattle is a very different commodity from december live
|
||||
cattle. the price of each will be dependent on the market’s perception of the supply-demand picture
|
||||
that it expects to prevail at each given time period. it is not unusual for a key cattle on feed report to
|
||||
carry bullish implications for near months and bearish connotations for distant months, or vice versa.
|
||||
in such a case, the futures market can often react by moving in opposite directions for the near and
|
||||
distant contracts. the key point is that in a bullish (bearish) situation, the market will sometimes view
|
||||
the near-term supply/demand balance as being more bullish (bearish) and sometimes it will view the
|
||||
distant situation as being more bullish (bearish). A similar behavioral pattern prevails in hogs.
|
||||
thus,
|
||||
the general rule would not apply in these types of markets.
|
||||
in these markets, rather than being concerned about the overall price direction, the spread trader
|
||||
is primarily concerned with how he thinks the market will perceive the fundamental situation in dif-
|
||||
ferent time periods. For example, at a given point in time, June cattle and
|
||||
december cattle may be
|
||||
trading at approximately equal levels. if the trader believes that marketings will become heavy in the
|
||||
months preceding the June expiration, placing pressure on that contract, and further believes the
|
||||
market psychology will view the situation as temporary, expecting prices to improve toward year-
|
||||
end, he would initiate a long
|
||||
december/short June cattle spread. note that if he is correct in the
|
||||
development of near-term pressure but the market expects even more pronounced weakness as time
|
||||
goes on, the trade will not work even if his expectations for improved prices toward year-end also
|
||||
prove accurate. One must always remember that a spread’s life span is limited to the expiration of the
|
||||
nearer month, and substantiation of the spread idea after that point will be of no benefit to the trader.
|
||||
thus, the trader is critically concerned, not only with the fundamentals themselves, but also with the
|
||||
market’s perception of the fundamentals, which may or may not be the same.
|
||||
■ Spread Rather Than Outright—An Example
|
||||
Frequently, the volatility of a given market may be so extreme that even a one-contract position may
|
||||
represent excessive risk for some traders.
|
||||
in such instances, spreads offer the trader an alternative
|
||||
approach to the market. For example, in early 2014, coffee futures surged dramatically, gaining more
|
||||
than 75 percent from late January to early March, with average daily price volatility more than tri-
|
||||
pling during that period.
|
||||
prices swung wildly for the next several months—pushing to a higher high
|
||||
in April, giving back more than half of the rally in the sell-off to the July low , and then rallying to yet
|
||||
another new high in October (see Figure 30.1). At that juncture, assume a low-risk trader believed
|
||||
that prevailing nearest futures prices near $2.22 in mid-October 2014 were unsustainable, but based
|
||||
on the market’s volatility (which was still around three times what it had been early in the year) and his
|
||||
money management rules felt he could not assume the risk of an outright position.
|
||||
such a trader could
|
||||
instead have entered a bear spread (e.g., short July 2015 coffee/long december 2015 coffee) and
|
||||
profited handsomely from the subsequent price slide. Figure 30.1 illustrates the close correspondence
|
||||
between the spread and the market.
|
||||
the fact that an outright position would have garnered a much
|
||||
larger profit is an irrelevant consideration, since the trader’s risk limitations would have prevented him
|
||||
from participating in the bear move altogether had his market view been confined to outright trades.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user