Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
Chapter 25: LEAPS 375
|
||||
The table also shows that only three of the discrepancies are not large. Two
|
||||
involve the stock price change. If the stock changes in price by 1 point, neither the at
|
||||
the-money nor the in-the-money options behave very differently, although the at-the
|
||||
money LEAPS do jump by 70 cents. The observant reader will notice that the top line
|
||||
of the table depicts the delta of the options in question; it shows the change in option
|
||||
price for a one-point change in stock price. The only other comparison that is not
|
||||
extremely divergent is that of volatility change for the at-the-money option. The 3-
|
||||
month call changes by 21 cents while the LEAPS changes by nearly ½ point. This is
|
||||
still a factor of two-to-one, but is much less than the other comparisons in the table.
|
||||
Study the other comparisons in the table. The trader who is used to dealing with
|
||||
short-term options might ordinarily ignore the effect of a rise in interest rates of ½
|
||||
of 1 %, of a 25-cent increase in the quarterly dividend, of the volatility increasing by
|
||||
a mere 1 %, or maybe even of the stock moving by one point (only if his option is out
|
||||
of-the-money). The LEAPS option trader will gain or suffer substantially and imme
|
||||
diately if any of these occur. In almost every case, his LEAPS call will gain or lose ½
|
||||
point of value - a significant amount, to be sure.
|
||||
LEAPS STRATEGIES
|
||||
Many of the strategies involving LEAPS are not significantly different from their
|
||||
counterparts that involve short-term options. However, as shown earlier, the long
|
||||
term nature of the LEAPS can sometimes cause the strategist to experience a result
|
||||
different from that to which he has become accustomed.
|
||||
As a general rule, one would want to be a buyer of LEAPS when interest rates
|
||||
were low and when the volatilities being implied in the marketplace are low. If the
|
||||
opposite were true (high rates and high volatilities), he would lean toward strategies
|
||||
in which the sale of LEAPS is used. Of course, there are many other specific consid
|
||||
erations when it comes to operating a strategy, but since the long-term nature of
|
||||
LEAPS exposes one to interest rate and volatility movements for such a long time,
|
||||
one may as well attempt to position himself favorably with respect to those two ele
|
||||
ments when he enters a position.
|
||||
LEAPS AS STOCK SUBSTITUTE
|
||||
Any in-the-money option can be used as a substitute for the underlying stock. Stock
|
||||
owners may be able to substitute a long in-the-money call for their long stock. Short
|
||||
sellers of stock may be able to substitute a long put for their short stock. This is not
|
||||
a new idea; it was discussed briefly in Chapter 3 under reasons why people buy calls.
|
||||
It has been available as a strategy for some time with short-term options. Its attrac
|
||||
tiveness seems to have increased somewhat with the introduction of LEAPS, howev-
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user