Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
Chapter 25: LEAPS 401
|
||||
LEAPS calls may help to alleviate this problem. Since they are such long-term
|
||||
calls, they are likely to have some time value premium in them. In-the-money calls that
|
||||
have time value premium are not normally assigned. As an alternative to shorting a
|
||||
stock that is not borrowable, one might try to sell an in-the-money LEAPS call, but
|
||||
only if it has time value premium remaining. Just because the call has a long time
|
||||
remaining until expiration does not mean that it must have time value premium, as will
|
||||
be seen in the following discussion. Finally, if one does sell the LEAPS call, he must
|
||||
realize that if the stock drops, the LEAPS call will not follow it completely. As the stock
|
||||
nears the strike, the amount of time value premium will build up to an even greater
|
||||
level in the LEAPS. Still, the naked call seller would make some profit in that case, and
|
||||
it presents a better alternative than not being able to sell the stock short at all.
|
||||
Early Assignment. An American-style option is one that can be exercised at any
|
||||
time during its life. All listed equity options, LEAPS included, are of this variety.
|
||||
Thus, any in-the-money option that has been sold may become subject to early
|
||||
assignment. The clue to whether early assignment is imminent is whether there is
|
||||
time value premium in the option. If the option has no time value premium - in other
|
||||
words, it is trading at parity or at a discount then assignment may be close at hand.
|
||||
The option writer who does not want to be assigned would want to cover the option
|
||||
when it no longer carries time premium.
|
||||
LEAPS may be subject to early assignment as well. It is possible, albeit far less
|
||||
likely, that a long-term option would lose all of its time value premium and therefore
|
||||
be subject to early assignment. This would certainly happen if the underlying stock
|
||||
were being taken over and a tender off er were coming to fruition. However, it may
|
||||
also occur because of an impending dividend payment, or more specifically, because
|
||||
the stock is about to go ex-dividend. Recall that the call owner, LEAPS calls includ
|
||||
ed, is not entitled to any dividends paid by the underlying stock. So if the call owner
|
||||
wants the dividend, he exercises his call on the day before the stock goes ex-dividend.
|
||||
This makes him an owner of the common stock just in the nick of time to get the div
|
||||
idend.
|
||||
What economic factors motivate him to exercise the call? If there is any time
|
||||
value premium at all in the call, the call holder would be better off selling the call in
|
||||
the open market and then purchasing the stock in the open market as well. In this
|
||||
manner, he would still get the dividend, but he would get a better price for his call
|
||||
when he sold it. If, however, there is no time value premium in the call, he does not
|
||||
have to bother with two transactions in the open market; he merely exercises his call
|
||||
in order to buy stock.
|
||||
All well and good, but what makes the call sell at parity before expiration? It has
|
||||
to do with the arbitrage that is available for any call option. In this case, the arbitrage
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user