Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
154 Part II: Call Option Strategies
|
||||
A more bullish write is constructed by buying 200 shares of the underlying stock
|
||||
and writing three calls. To quickly verify that this ratio (3:2) is more bullish, again use
|
||||
49 for the stock price and 6 for the call price, and now assume that two round lots
|
||||
were purchased.
|
||||
Maximum profit= (50-49) x 2 + 3 x 6 = 20
|
||||
Downside break-even = 50 - 20/2 = 40
|
||||
Upside break-even= 50 + 20/(3 - 2) = 70
|
||||
Thus, this ratio of 3 calls against 200 shares of stock has break-even points of 40 and
|
||||
70, reflecting a more bullish posture on the underlying stock.
|
||||
A 2: 1 ratio may not necessarily be neutral. There is, in fact, a mathematically
|
||||
correct way of determining exactly what a neutral ratio should be. The neutral ratio
|
||||
is determined by dividing the delta of the written call into 1. Assume that the delta of
|
||||
the XYZ October 50 call in the previous example is .60. Then the neutral ratio is
|
||||
1.0/.60, or 5 to 3. This means that one might buy 300 shares and sell 5 calls. Using
|
||||
the formulae above, the details of this position can be observed:
|
||||
Maximum profit= (50 -49) x 3 + 5 x 6 = 33
|
||||
Downside break-even = 50 - 33/3 = 39
|
||||
Upside break-even = 50 + 33/(5 --3) = 66½
|
||||
According to the mathematics of the situation, then, this would be a neutral position
|
||||
initially. It is often the case that a 5:3 ratio is approximately neutral for an at-the
|
||||
money call.
|
||||
By now, the reader should have recognized a similarity between the ratio writ
|
||||
ing strategy and the reverse hedge (or simulated straddle) strategy presented in
|
||||
Chapter 4. The two strategies are the reverse of each other; in fact, this is how the
|
||||
reverse hedge strategy acquired its name. The ratio write has a profit graph that looks
|
||||
like a roof, while the reverse hedge has a profit graph that looks like a trough - the
|
||||
roof upside down. In one strategy the investor buys stock and sells calls, while the
|
||||
other strategy is just the opposite - the investor shorts stock and buys calls. Which
|
||||
one is better? The answer depends on whether the calls are "cheap" or "expensive."
|
||||
Even though ratio writing has limited profits and potentially large losses, the strate
|
||||
gy will result in a profit in a large majority of cases, if held to expiration. However,
|
||||
one may be forced to make adjustments to stock moves that occur prior to expiration.
|
||||
The reverse hedge strategy, with its limited losses and potentially large profits, pro
|
||||
vides profits only on large stock moves - a less frequent event. Thus, in stable mar
|
||||
kets, the ratio writing strategy is generally superior. However, in times of depressed
|
||||
option premiums, the reverse hedge strategy gains a distinct advantage. If calls are
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user