Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
Otpt,r 32: Structured Products 617
|
||||
Note that his downside risk is not completely eliminated, though. The current
|
||||
prke of the structured product is 16.50 and the cash value at the current S&P price
|
||||
11117.14 (see the previous example for this calculation), so he has risk from these lev
|
||||
down to a price of $14.53.
|
||||
His upside is still unlimited, because he is net long two calls - the S&P 2-year
|
||||
1,,EAPS calls, struck at 1,200. The two LEAPS calls that he sold, struck at 700, effec
|
||||
tively offsets the call imbedded in the structured product, which is also struck at 700.
|
||||
This example showed how one could effectively roll the striking price of his
|
||||
structured product up to a higher price after the underlying had advanced. The indi
|
||||
vidual investor would have to decide if the extra downside protection acquired is
|
||||
worth the profit potential sacrificed. That depends heavily, of course, on the prices of
|
||||
the listed S&P options, which in turn depend on things such as volatility and time
|
||||
remaining until expiration.
|
||||
Of course, one other alternative exists for a holder of a structured product who
|
||||
has built up a good profit, as in the previous two examples: He could sell the prod
|
||||
uct he owns and buy another one with a striking price closer to the current market
|
||||
value of the underlying index. This is not always possible, of course, but as long as
|
||||
these products continue to be brought to market every few months or so by the
|
||||
underwriters, there will be a wide variety of striking prices to choose from. A possi
|
||||
ble drawback to rolling to another structured product is that one might have to
|
||||
extend his holding's maturity date, but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
|
||||
A different scenario exists when the underlying index drops after the structured
|
||||
product is bought. In that case, one would own a synthetic call option that might be
|
||||
quite far out-of the-rrwney. A listed call spread could be used to theoretically lower
|
||||
the call's striking price, so that upside movement might more readily produce prof
|
||||
its. In such a case, one would sell a listed call option with a striking price equal to the
|
||||
striking price of the structured product and would buy a listed call option with a
|
||||
lower striking price - one more in line with current market values. In other words,
|
||||
he would buy a listed call bull spread to go along with his structured product.
|
||||
Whatever debit he pays for this call bull spread will increase his downside risk, of
|
||||
course. However, in return he ~s the ability to make profits more quickly if the
|
||||
underlying index rises above the new, lower striking price.
|
||||
Many other strategies involving listed options and the structured product could
|
||||
be constructed, of course. However, the ones presented here are the primary strate
|
||||
gies that an investor should consider. All that is required to analyze any strategy is to
|
||||
remember that this type of structured product is merely a synthetic long call. Once
|
||||
that concept is in mind, then any ensuing strategies involving listed options can easily
|
||||
be analyzed. For example, the purchase of a listed put with a striking price essential-
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user