Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

This commit is contained in:
2025-12-23 21:17:22 -08:00
commit 619e87aacc
2140 changed files with 2513895 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
394 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies
Downside Protection. The actual downside break-even point might enter into
one's thinking as well. A downside break-even point of 40.3 is available by using the
LEAPS write, and that is a known quantity. No matter how far XYZ might fall, as long
as it can recover to slightly over 40 by expiration two years from now, the investment
will at least break even. A problem arises if XYZ falls to 40 quickly. If that happened,
the LEAPS call would still have a significant amount of time value premium remain­
ing on it. Thus, if the investor attempted to sell his stock at that time and buy back
his call, he would have a loss, not a break-even situation.
The short-term write offers downside protection only to a stock price of 46.2.
Of course, repeated writes of 6-month calls over the next 2 years would lower the
break-even point below that level. The problem is that if XYZ declines and one is
forced to keep selling 6-month calls every 6 months, he may be forced to use a lower
striking price, thereby locking in a smaller profit ( or possibly even a loss) if premium
levels shrink. The concepts of rolling down are described in detail in Chapter 2.
A further word about rolling down may be in order here. Recall that rolling
down means buying back the call that is currently written and selling another one
with a lower striking price. Such action always reduces the profitability of the over­
all position, although it may be necessary to prevent further downside losses if the
common stock keeps declining. Now that LEAPS are available, the short-term writer
faced with rolling down may look to the LEAPS as a means of bringing in a healthy
premium even though he is rolling down. It is true that a large premium could be
brought into the account. But remember that by doing so, one is committing himself
to sell the stock at a lower price than he had originally intended. This is why the
rolling down reduces the original profit potential. If he rolls down into a LEAPS call,
he is reducing his maximum profit potential for a longer period of time.
Consequently, one should not always roll dm,vn into an option with a longer maturi­
ty. Instead, he should carefully analyze whether he wants to be committed for an
even longer time to a position in which the underlying common stock is declining.
To summarize, the large absolute premiums available in LEAPS calls may make
a covered write of those calls seem unusually attractive. However, one should calcu­
late the returns available and decide whether a short-term write might not serve his
purpose as well. Even though the large LEAPS premium might reduce the initial
investment to a mere pittance, be aware that this creates a great amount of leverage,
and leverage can be a dangerous thing.
The large amount of downside protection offered by the LEAPS call is real, but
if the stock falls quickly, there would definitely be a loss at the calculated downside
break-even point. Finally, one cannot always roll down into a LEAPS call if trouble
develops, because he will be committing himself for an even longer period of time to
sell his stock at a lower price than he had originally intended.