Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
394 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies
|
||||
Downside Protection. The actual downside break-even point might enter into
|
||||
one's thinking as well. A downside break-even point of 40.3 is available by using the
|
||||
LEAPS write, and that is a known quantity. No matter how far XYZ might fall, as long
|
||||
as it can recover to slightly over 40 by expiration two years from now, the investment
|
||||
will at least break even. A problem arises if XYZ falls to 40 quickly. If that happened,
|
||||
the LEAPS call would still have a significant amount of time value premium remain
|
||||
ing on it. Thus, if the investor attempted to sell his stock at that time and buy back
|
||||
his call, he would have a loss, not a break-even situation.
|
||||
The short-term write offers downside protection only to a stock price of 46.2.
|
||||
Of course, repeated writes of 6-month calls over the next 2 years would lower the
|
||||
break-even point below that level. The problem is that if XYZ declines and one is
|
||||
forced to keep selling 6-month calls every 6 months, he may be forced to use a lower
|
||||
striking price, thereby locking in a smaller profit ( or possibly even a loss) if premium
|
||||
levels shrink. The concepts of rolling down are described in detail in Chapter 2.
|
||||
A further word about rolling down may be in order here. Recall that rolling
|
||||
down means buying back the call that is currently written and selling another one
|
||||
with a lower striking price. Such action always reduces the profitability of the over
|
||||
all position, although it may be necessary to prevent further downside losses if the
|
||||
common stock keeps declining. Now that LEAPS are available, the short-term writer
|
||||
faced with rolling down may look to the LEAPS as a means of bringing in a healthy
|
||||
premium even though he is rolling down. It is true that a large premium could be
|
||||
brought into the account. But remember that by doing so, one is committing himself
|
||||
to sell the stock at a lower price than he had originally intended. This is why the
|
||||
rolling down reduces the original profit potential. If he rolls down into a LEAPS call,
|
||||
he is reducing his maximum profit potential for a longer period of time.
|
||||
Consequently, one should not always roll dm,vn into an option with a longer maturi
|
||||
ty. Instead, he should carefully analyze whether he wants to be committed for an
|
||||
even longer time to a position in which the underlying common stock is declining.
|
||||
To summarize, the large absolute premiums available in LEAPS calls may make
|
||||
a covered write of those calls seem unusually attractive. However, one should calcu
|
||||
late the returns available and decide whether a short-term write might not serve his
|
||||
purpose as well. Even though the large LEAPS premium might reduce the initial
|
||||
investment to a mere pittance, be aware that this creates a great amount of leverage,
|
||||
and leverage can be a dangerous thing.
|
||||
The large amount of downside protection offered by the LEAPS call is real, but
|
||||
if the stock falls quickly, there would definitely be a loss at the calculated downside
|
||||
break-even point. Finally, one cannot always roll down into a LEAPS call if trouble
|
||||
develops, because he will be committing himself for an even longer period of time to
|
||||
sell his stock at a lower price than he had originally intended.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user