Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
Chapter 35: Futures Option Strategies for Futures Spreads 717
|
||||
Example: The strategist decides that, since his goal was for the futures spread to
|
||||
widen to 12 cents, he will not remove the position when the spread is only 8 cents,
|
||||
as it is now. However, he wants to take some action to protect his current profit, while
|
||||
still retaining the possibility to have the profit expand.
|
||||
As a first step, the equivalent futures position (EFP) is calculated. The pertinent
|
||||
data is shown in Table 35-5.
|
||||
TABLE 35-5.
|
||||
EFP of long combination.
|
||||
Future or Option
|
||||
January heating oil futures:
|
||||
January unleaded gasoline futures:
|
||||
January heating oil 60 call: Long 5
|
||||
January unleaded gas 62 put: Long 5
|
||||
Price
|
||||
.7100
|
||||
.6300
|
||||
11.05
|
||||
1.50
|
||||
Delta
|
||||
0.99
|
||||
-0.40
|
||||
EFP
|
||||
+4.95
|
||||
-2.00
|
||||
Total EFP: +2.95
|
||||
Overall, the position is long the equivalent of about three futures contracts. The
|
||||
position's profitability is mostly related to whether the futures rise or fall in price, not
|
||||
to how the spread between heating oil futures and unleaded gas futures behaves.
|
||||
The strategist could easily neutralize the long delta by selling three contracts.
|
||||
This would leave room for more profits if prices continue to rise ( there are still two
|
||||
extra long calls). It would also provide downside protection if prices suddenly drop,
|
||||
since the 5 long puts plus the 3 short futures would offset any loss in the 5 in-the
|
||||
money calls.
|
||||
Which futures should the strategist short? That depends on how confident he is
|
||||
in his original analysis of the intermarket spread widening. If he still thinks it will
|
||||
widen further, then he should sell unleaded gasoline futures against the deeply in
|
||||
the-money heating oil calls. This would give him an additional profit or loss opportu
|
||||
nity based on the relationship of the two oil products. However, ifhe decides that the
|
||||
intermarket spread should have widened more than this by now, perhaps he will just
|
||||
sell 3 heating oil futures as a direct hedge against the heating oil calls.
|
||||
Once one finds himself in a profitable situation, as in the above example, the
|
||||
rrwst conservative course is to hedge the in-the-rrwney option with its own underly
|
||||
ing future. This action lessens the further dependency of the profits on the inter
|
||||
market spread. There is still profit potential remaining from futures price action.
|
||||
Furthermore, if the futures should fall so far that both options return to in-the
|
||||
money status, then the intermarket spread comes back into play. Thus, in the above
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user