Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
448
|
||||
A Complete Guide to the Futures mArket
|
||||
prices and rising interest rates could cause full carry to move beyond 200 points, increasing the trad-
|
||||
er’s risk correspondingly. in such an instance, it is theoretically possible for the given spread to move
|
||||
significantly beyond the point the trader considered the maximum risk point. Although such an event
|
||||
can occur, it should be emphasized that it is rather unusual, since in a limited-risk spread increased
|
||||
carrying costs due to sharply higher price levels will usually imply larger gains for the nearby months.
|
||||
As for interest rates, changes substantial enough to influence marked changes in carrying costs will
|
||||
usually take time to develop.
|
||||
Another example of a limited-risk spread that might contain hidden risk is the case in which
|
||||
the government imposes price ceilings on nearby contracts but not on the more distant contracts.
|
||||
Although highly unusual, this situation has happened before and represents a possible risk that the
|
||||
spread trader should consider in the unlikely event that the prevailing political environment is condu-
|
||||
cive to the enactment of price controls.
|
||||
Also, for short intervals of time, spread differences may well exceed full carry due to the absence
|
||||
of price limits on the nearby contract. For a number of commodities, price limits on the nearby
|
||||
contract are removed at some point before its expiration (e.g., first notice day, first trading day of
|
||||
the expiring month, etc.). Consequently, in a sharply declining market, the nearby month can move
|
||||
to a discount exceeding full carry as the forward month is contained by price limits. Although this
|
||||
situation will usually correct itself within a few days, in the interim, it can generate a substantial mar-
|
||||
gin call for the spread trader.
|
||||
it is important that spread traders holding their positions beyond the
|
||||
removal of price limits on the nearby contract are sufficiently capitalized to easily handle such possible
|
||||
temporary spread aberrations.
|
||||
As a final word, it should be emphasized that although there is a theoretical limit on the premium that
|
||||
a distant month can command over a nearby contract in carrying-charge markets, there is no similar limit on the
|
||||
premium that a nearby position can command.
|
||||
nearby premiums are usually indicative of a tight current
|
||||
supply situation, and there is no way of determining an upper limit to the premium the market will
|
||||
place on more immediately available supplies.
|
||||
■ The Spread Trade—Analysis and Approach
|
||||
Step 1: Straightforward historical Comparison
|
||||
A logical starting point is a survey of the price action of the given spread during recent years. Histori-
|
||||
cal spread charts, if available, are ideal for this purpose. if charts (or historical price data that can be
|
||||
downloaded into a spreadsheet) are unavailable, the trader should, if possible, scan historical price
|
||||
data, checking the difference of the given spread on a biweekly or monthly basis for at least the past
|
||||
5 to 10 years.
|
||||
this can prove to be a time-consuming endeavor, but a spread trade initiated without
|
||||
any concept of historical patterns is, in a sense, a shot in the dark. Although spreads can deviate
|
||||
widely from historical patterns, it is still important to know the normal range of a spread, as well as
|
||||
its “average” level.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user