Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
602 Part V: Index Options and Futures
|
||||
COMPUTING THE VALUE OF THE IMBEDDED CALL WHEN
|
||||
THE UNDERLYING IS TRADING AT A DISCOUNT
|
||||
Can we compute the value of the imbedded call when the structured product itself
|
||||
is trading at a discount to its guarantee price? Yes, the formulae presented earlier can
|
||||
always be used to compute the value of the imbedded call.
|
||||
Example: Again using the example of JEM, the structured product on the Nikkei
|
||||
index, recall that it was trading at 8. 75 with a guaranteed price of 10, with maturity
|
||||
40 months hence. Assume that the risk-free interest rate at the time was 5.5%.
|
||||
Assuming continuous compounding, $8.75 invested today would be worth $10.51 in
|
||||
40 months.
|
||||
Money in the bank = 8. 75 x ert
|
||||
where r = 0.05 and t = 3.33 years (40 months)
|
||||
Money in the bank= 8.75 x e0-055 x 3-333 = 10.51
|
||||
Since the structured product will be worth 10 at maturity, the value of the call
|
||||
is 0.51.
|
||||
There is another, nearly equivalent way to determine the value of the call. It
|
||||
involves determining where the structured product would be trading if it were com
|
||||
pletely a zero-coupon debt of the underwriting brokerage. The difference between
|
||||
that value and the actual trading price of the structured product is the value of the
|
||||
imbedded call.
|
||||
The credit rating of the underwriter of the structured product is an important
|
||||
factor in how large a discount occurs. Recall that the guarantee price is only as good
|
||||
as the creditworthiness of the underwriter. The underwriter is the one who will pay
|
||||
the cash settlement value at maturity - not the exchange where the product is listed
|
||||
nor any sort of clearinghouse or corporation.
|
||||
THE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
|
||||
In recent years, some of the structured products have been issued with an adjustment
|
||||
factor. The adjustment factor is generally a negative thing for investors, although the
|
||||
underwriters try to couch it in language that makes it difficult to discern what is going
|
||||
on. Simply put, the adjustment factor is a multiplier (less than 100%) applied to the
|
||||
underlying index value before calculating the Final Cash Value. Adjustment factors
|
||||
seemed to come into being at about the time that index option implied volatility
|
||||
began to trade at much higher levels than it ever had (1997 onward).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user