Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
15FOr Beginners Only
|
||||
this wide discount, the hedge is still very profitable because the price differential is ultimately
|
||||
far outweighed by the intervening price decline. Thus, the relevant question is not whether the
|
||||
futures-implied cash price is attractive relative to the current cash price, but rather whether it is
|
||||
attractive relative to the expected future cash price.
|
||||
6. The hedger does not precisely lock in a transaction price. His effective price will depend on
|
||||
the basis. For example, if the cotton producer sells futures at 85¢/lb, assuming a −3¢ basis, his
|
||||
effective sales price will be 80¢/lb, rather than the anticipated 82¢/lb, if the actual basis at the
|
||||
time of offset is −5¢. However, it should be emphasized that this basis-price uncertainty is far
|
||||
smaller than the outright price uncertainty in an unhedged position. Furthermore, by using
|
||||
reasonably conservative basis assumptions the hedger can increase the likelihood of achieving,
|
||||
or bettering, the assumed locked-in price.
|
||||
7. a lthough a hedger plans to buy or sell the actual commodity, it will usually be far more efficient
|
||||
to offset the futures position and use the local cash market for the actual transaction. Futures
|
||||
should be viewed as a pricing tool, not as a vehicle for making or taking delivery.
|
||||
8. Most standard discussions of hedging make no mention whatsoever of price forecasting.
|
||||
This omission seems to imply that hedgers need not be concerned about the direction of
|
||||
prices.
|
||||
although this conclusion may be valid for some hedgers (e.g., a middleman seek-
|
||||
ing to lock in a profit margin between the purchase and sales price), it is erroneous for
|
||||
most hedgers. There is little sense in following an automatic hedging program.
|
||||
rather,
|
||||
the hedger should evaluate the relative attractiveness of the price protection offered by
|
||||
futures. Price forecasting would be a key element in making such an evaluation.
|
||||
in this
|
||||
respect, it can easily be argued that price forecasting is as important to many hedgers as it
|
||||
is to speculators.
|
||||
■ Trading
|
||||
The trader seeks to profit by anticipating price changes. For example, if the price of December gold
|
||||
is $1,150/oz, a trader who expects the price to rise above $1,250/oz will go long. The trader has
|
||||
no intention of actually taking delivery of the gold in December.
|
||||
right or wrong, the trader will
|
||||
offset the position sometime before expiration. For example, if the price rises to $1,275 and the
|
||||
trader decides to take profits, the gain on the trade will be $12,500 per contract (100 oz × $125/
|
||||
oz).
|
||||
if, on the other hand, the trader’s forecast is wrong and prices decline to $1,075/oz, with the
|
||||
expiration date drawing near, the trader has little choice but to liquidate. in this situation, the loss
|
||||
would be equal to $7,500 per contract. note that the trader would not take delivery even given
|
||||
a desire to maintain the long gold position. in this case, the trader would liquidate the December
|
||||
contract and simultaneously go long in a more forward contract. (This type of transaction is called
|
||||
a rollover and would be implemented with a spread order—defined in the next section.) Traders
|
||||
should avoid taking delivery, since it can often result in substantial extra costs without any com-
|
||||
pensating benefits.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user