Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

training_data/curated/text/33da2b06cd8404f3390f9ee337f2281a6cbf8c3b0838bd83e168826615259b9b.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+388 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies 
+FIGURE 25·5. 
+Call delta comparison, 2-year LEAPS versus 3-month equity options. 
+90 
+80 
+70 
+8 60 ,... 
+X 
+.l!l 50 
+Q) 
+0 40 
+30 t= 3 months 
+20 
+10 
+O 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 
+Stock Price 
+Example: XYZ is trading at 82. There are 3-month calls with strikes of 80 and 90, and 
+there are 2-year LEAPS calls at those strikes as well. The following table summarizes 
+the available information: 
+XYZ: 82 Date: January, 2002 
+Option Price Delta 
+April ('02) 80 call 4 s/a 
+April ('02) 90 call i/a 
+January ('04) 80 LEAPS call 14 3/4 
+January ('04) 90 LEAPS call 7 1/2 
+Suppose the trader expects a 3-point move by the underlying common stock, from 82 
+to 85. If he were analyzing short-term calls, he would see his potential as a gain of 17/s 
+in the April 80 call versus a gain of 3/s in the April 90 call. Each of these gains is pro­
+jected by multiplying the call's delta times 3 (the expected stock move, in points). 
+Thus, there is a large difference between the expected gains from these two options, 
+particularly after commissions are considered. 
+Now observe the LEAPS. The January 80 would increase by 2¼ while the 
+January 90 would increase by 1 ½ if XYZ moved higher by 3 points. This is not near­
+ly as large a discrepancy as the short-term options had. Observe that the January 90 
+LEAPS sells for half the price of the January 80. These movements projected by the