Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
Buying the Calendar
|
||||
The calendar spread and all its variations are commonly associated with
|
||||
income-generating spreads. Using calendar spreads as income generators is
|
||||
popular among retail and professional traders alike. The process involves
|
||||
buying a longer-term at-the-money option and selling a shorter-term at-the-
|
||||
money (ATM) option. The options must be either both calls or both puts.
|
||||
Because this transaction results in a net debit—the longer-term option being
|
||||
purchased has a higher premium than the shorter-term option being sold—
|
||||
this is referred to as buying the calendar.
|
||||
The main intent of buying a calendar spread for income is to profit from
|
||||
the positive net theta of the position. Because the shorter-term ATM option
|
||||
decays at a faster rate than the longer-term ATM option, the net theta is
|
||||
positive. As for most income spreads, the ideal outcome occurs when the
|
||||
underlying is at the short strike (in this case, shared strike) when the
|
||||
shorter-term option expires. At this strike price, the long option has its
|
||||
highest value, while the short option expires without the trader’s getting
|
||||
assigned. As long as the underlying remains close to the strike price, the
|
||||
value of the spread rises as time passes, because the short option decreases
|
||||
in value faster than the long option.
|
||||
For example, a trader, Richard, watches Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY)
|
||||
on a regular basis. Richard believes that Bed Bath & Beyond will trade in a
|
||||
range around $57.50 a share (where it is trading now) over the next month.
|
||||
Richard buys the January–February 57.50 call calendar for 0.80. Assuming
|
||||
January has 25 days until expiration and February has 53 days, Richard will
|
||||
execute the following trade:
|
||||
Richard’s best-case scenario occurs when the January calls expire at
|
||||
expiration and the February calls retain much of their value.
|
||||
If Richard created an at-expiration P&(L) diagram for his position, he’d
|
||||
have trouble because of the staggered expiration months. A general
|
||||
representation would look something like Exhibit 11.1 .
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user