Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
76 Part II: Call Option Strategies
|
||||
Technical analysis may be able to provide a little help for the writer faced with
|
||||
the dilemma of rolling down to lock in a loss or else holding onto a position that has
|
||||
no further downside protection. IfXYZ has broken a support level or important trend
|
||||
line, it is added evidence for rolling down. In our example, it is difficult to imagine
|
||||
the case in which a $20 stocksuddenly drops to become a $16 stock without sub
|
||||
stantial harm to its technical picture. Nevertheless, if the charts should show that
|
||||
there is support at 15½ or 16, it may be worth the writer's while to wait and see if
|
||||
that support level can hold before rolling down.
|
||||
Perhaps the best way to avoid having to lock in losses would be to establish posi
|
||||
tions that are less likely to become such a problem. In-the-money covered writes on
|
||||
higher-priced stocks that have a moderate amount of volatility will rarely force the
|
||||
writer to lock in a loss by rolling down. Of course, any stock, should it fall far enough
|
||||
and fast enough, could force the writer to lock in a loss if he has to roll down two or
|
||||
thr..ee times in a fairly short time span. However, the higher-priced stock has striking
|
||||
prices that are much closer together (in percentages); it thus presents the writer with
|
||||
the opportunity to utilize a new option with a lower striking price much sooner in the
|
||||
decline of the stock. Also, higher volatility should help in generating large enough
|
||||
premiums that substantial portions of the stock's decline can be hedged by rolling
|
||||
down. Conversely, low-priced stocks, especially nonvolatile ones, often present the
|
||||
most severe problems for the covered writer when they decline in price.
|
||||
A related point concerning order entry can be inserted here. When one simul
|
||||
taneously buys one call and sells another, he is executing a spread. Spreads in gener
|
||||
al are discussed at length later. However, the covered writer should be aware that
|
||||
whenever he rolls his position, the order can be placed as a spread order. This will
|
||||
normally help the writer to obtain a better price execution.
|
||||
AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF ROLLING DOWN
|
||||
There is another alternative that the covered writer can use to attempt to gain some
|
||||
additional downside protection without necessarily having to lock in a loss. Basically,
|
||||
the writer rolls down only part of his covered writing position.
|
||||
Example: One thousand shares of XYZ were bought at 20 and 10 January 20 calls
|
||||
were sold at 2 points each. As before, the stock falls to 16, with the following prices:
|
||||
XYZ January 20 call, ½; and XYZ January 15 call, 2½. As was demonstrated in the last
|
||||
section, if the writer were to roll all 10 calls down from the January 20 to the January
|
||||
15, he would be locking in a loss. Although there may be some justification for this
|
||||
action, the writer would naturally rather not have to place himself in such a position.
|
||||
One can attempt to achieve some balance between added downside protection
|
||||
and upward profit potential by rolling down only part of the calls. In this example,
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user