Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
Chapter 2: Covered Call Writing 67
|
||||
The writer wishing to establish a covered write against XYZ common stock may like
|
||||
the protection afforded by the April 40 call, but may not find the return particularly
|
||||
attractive. He may be able to improve his return by writing April 45's against part of
|
||||
his position. Assume the writer is considering buying 1,000 shares of XYZ. Table 2-18
|
||||
compares the attributes of writing the out-of-the-money (April 45) only, or of writing
|
||||
only the in-the-money (April 40), or of writing 5 of each. The table is based on a cash
|
||||
covered write, but returns and protection would be similar for a margin write.
|
||||
Commissions are included in the figures.
|
||||
It is easily seen that the "combined" write - half of the position against the April
|
||||
40's and the other half against the April 45's - offers the best balance of return and
|
||||
protection. The in-the-money call, by itself, provides over 10% downside protection,
|
||||
but the 5% return if exercised is less than 1 % per month. Thus, one might not want
|
||||
to write April 40's against his entire position, because the potential return is small. At
|
||||
the same time, the April 45's, if written against the entire stock position, would pro
|
||||
vide for an attractive return if exercised (over 2% per month) but offer only 5% down
|
||||
side protection. The combined write, which has the better features of both options,
|
||||
offers over 8% return if exercised (11h% per month) and affords over 8% downside
|
||||
protection. By writing both calls, the writer has potentially solved the problems inher
|
||||
ent in writing entirely out-of-the-moneys or entirely in-the-moneys. The "combined"
|
||||
write frees the covered writer from having to initially take a bearish (in-the-money
|
||||
write) or bullish (out-of-the-money write) posture on the stock ifhe does not want to.
|
||||
This is often necessary on a low-volatility stock trading between striking prices.
|
||||
TABLE 2-18.
|
||||
Attributes of various writes.
|
||||
Buy 1,000 XYZ and sell
|
||||
Return if exercised
|
||||
Re~rn if unchanged
|
||||
Percent protection
|
||||
In-the-Money
|
||||
Write
|
||||
10 April 40's
|
||||
5.1%
|
||||
5.1%
|
||||
10.5%
|
||||
Out-of-the-Money
|
||||
Write
|
||||
l O April 45's
|
||||
12.2%
|
||||
6.0%
|
||||
5.7%
|
||||
Write
|
||||
Both Calls
|
||||
5 April 40's and
|
||||
5 April 45's
|
||||
8.4%
|
||||
5.4%
|
||||
8.1%
|
||||
For those who prefer a graphic representation, the profit graph shown in Figure
|
||||
2-2 compares the combined write of both calls with either the in-the-money write or
|
||||
the out-of-the-money write (dashed lines). It can be observed that all three choices
|
||||
are equal if XYZ is near 42 at expiration; all three lines intersect there.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user