Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
600 Part V: Index Options and Futures
|
||||
Solving the following equation for $MID would give the desired answer:
|
||||
Cash Value = 13 = 10 + 11.5 x ($MID/166.l - 1)
|
||||
3 = 11.5 x $MID/ 166.1 - 11.5
|
||||
14.5 x 166.1 / 11.5 = $MID
|
||||
209.43 = $MID
|
||||
So, if $MID were at 209.43, the cash value would be 13 - the price the investor
|
||||
is currently paying for SIS. This is protection of 12.2% down from the current price
|
||||
of 238.54. That is, $MID could decline 12.2% at maturity, from the current price of
|
||||
238.54 to a price of 209.43, and the investor who bought SIS would break even
|
||||
because it would still have a cash value of 13.
|
||||
Of course, this discount could have been computed using the SIS prices of 13
|
||||
and 15.02 as well, but many investors prefer to view it in terms of the underlying
|
||||
index - especially if the underlying is a popular and often-cited index such as the S&P
|
||||
500 or Dow-Jones Industrials.
|
||||
From Figure 32-1, it is evident that the discount persisted throughout the
|
||||
entire life of the product, shrinking more or less linearly until expiration.
|
||||
SIS TRADING AT A DISCOUNT TO THE GUARANTEE PRICE
|
||||
In the previous example, the investor could have bought SIS at a discount to its cash
|
||||
value computation, but if the stock market had declined considerably, he would still
|
||||
have had exposure from his SIS purchase price of 13 down to the guarantee price of
|
||||
10. The discount would have mitigated his percentage loss when compared to the
|
||||
$MID index itself, but it would be a loss nevertheless.
|
||||
However, there are sometimes occasions when the structured product is trad
|
||||
ing at a discount not only to cash value, but also to the guarantee price. This situation
|
||||
occurred frequently in the early trading life of SIS. From Figure 32-1, you can see
|
||||
that in 1995 the cash value was near 11, but SIS was trading at a discount of more
|
||||
than 2 points. In other words, SIS was trading below its guarantee price, while the
|
||||
cash value was actually above the guarantee price. It is a "double bonus" for an
|
||||
investor when such a situation occurs.
|
||||
Example: In February 1995, the following prices existed:
|
||||
$MID: 177.59
|
||||
SIS: 8.75
|
||||
For a moment, set aside considerations of the cash value. If one were to buy SIS
|
||||
at 8. 75 and hold it for the 5.5 years remaining until maturity, he would make 1.25
|
||||
points on his 8.75 investment- a return of 14.3% for the 5.5-year holding period. As
|
||||
a compounded rate of interest, this is an annual compound return of 2.43%.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user