Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
interest and dividends remain constant. Ultimately, the maximum loss will
|
||||
be 0.80, the premium paid, if there is no time value or carry considerations.
|
||||
The maximum profit is gained if Bed Bath & Beyond is at $57.50 at
|
||||
expiration. At this price, the February 57.50 call is worth the most it can be
|
||||
worth without having the January 57.50 call assigned and creating negative
|
||||
deltas to the upside. But how much precisely is the maximum profit?
|
||||
Richard would have to know what the February 57.50 call would be worth
|
||||
with Bed Bath & Beyond stock trading at $57.50 at February expiration
|
||||
before he can know the maximum profit potential. Although Richard can’t
|
||||
know for sure at what price the calls will be trading, he can use a pricing
|
||||
model to estimate the call’s value. Exhibit 11.2 shows analytics at January
|
||||
expiration.
|
||||
EXHIBIT 11.2 Bed Bath & Beyond January–February 57.50 call calendar
|
||||
greeks at January expiration.
|
||||
With an unchanged implied volatility of 23 percent, an interest rate of two
|
||||
percent, and no dividend payable before February expiration, the February
|
||||
57.50 calls would be valued at 1.53 at January expiration. In this best-case
|
||||
scenario, therefore, the spread would go from 0.80, where Richard
|
||||
purchased it, to 1.53, for a gain of 91 percent. At January expiration, with
|
||||
Bed Bath & Beyond at $57.50, the January call would expire; thus, the
|
||||
spread is composed of just the February 57.50 call.
|
||||
Let’s now go back in time and see how Richard figured this trade. Exhibit
|
||||
11.3 shows the position when the trade is established.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user