Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

training_data/curated/text/191da56eb756b055f13c0394e9684efde8a0a1fc69aed392519eb3606bb90e33.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Long ITM Call
+Kim also has the alternative to buy an ITM call. Instead of the 35 or 37.50
+call, she can buy the 32.50. The 32.50 call shares some of the advantages
+the 37.50 call has over the 35 call, but its overall greek characteristics make
+it a very different trade from the two previous alternatives. Exhibit 4.10
+shows a comparison of the greeks of the three different calls.
+EXHIBIT 4.10 Greeks for Disney 32.50, 35, and 37.50 calls.
+Like the 37.50 call, the 32.50 has a lower gamma, theta, and vega than the
+ATM 35-strike call. Because the call is ITM, it has a higher delta: 0.862. In
+this example, Kim can buy the 32.50 call for 3. That’s 0.40 over parity (3 −
+[35.10 − 32.50] = 0.40). There is not much time value, but more than the
+37.50 call has. Thus, theta is of some concern. Ultimately, the ITMs have
+0.40 of time value to lose compared with the 0.20 of the OTM calls. Vega is
+also of some concern, but not as much as in the other alternatives because
+the vega of the 32.50 is lower than the 35s or the 37.50s. Gamma doesn’t
+help much as the stock rallies—it will get smaller as the stock price rises.
+Gamma will, however, slow losses somewhat if the stock declines by
+decreasing delta at an increasing rate.
+In this case, the greek of greatest consequence is delta—it is a more
+purely directional play than the other alternatives discussed. Exhibit 4.11
+shows the matrix of the delta of the 32.50 call.
+EXHIBIT 4.11 Disney 32.50 call price–time matrix–delta.