Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
Chapter 36: The Basics of Volatility Trading 729
|
||||
underlying over the life of the option. The computation and comparison of these two
|
||||
measures can aid immensely in predicting the forthcoming volatility of the underly
|
||||
ing instrument - a crucial matter in determining today's option prices.
|
||||
Historical volatility can be measured with a specific formula, as shown in the ·
|
||||
chapter on mathematical applications. It is merely the formula for standard deviation
|
||||
as contained in most elementary books on statistics. The important point to under
|
||||
stand is that it is an exact calculation, and there is little debate over how to compute
|
||||
historical volatility. It is not important to know what the actual measurement means.
|
||||
That is, if one says that a certain stock has a historical volatility of 20%, that by itself
|
||||
is a relatively meaningless number to anyone but an ardent statistician. However, it
|
||||
can be used for comparative purposes.
|
||||
The standard deviation is expressed as a percent. One can determine that the
|
||||
historical volatility of the broad stock market has usually been in the range of 15% to
|
||||
20%. A very volatile stock might have an historical volatility in excess of 100%. These
|
||||
numbers can be compared to each other, so that one might say that a stock with the
|
||||
latter historical volatility is five times more volatile that the "stock market." So, the
|
||||
historical volatility of one instrument can be compared with that of another instru
|
||||
ment in order to determine which one is more volatile. That in itself is a useful func
|
||||
tion of historical volatility, but its uses go much farther than that.
|
||||
Historical volatility can be measured over different time periods to give one a
|
||||
sense of how volatile the underlying has been over varying lengths of time. For exam
|
||||
ple, it is common to compute a 10-day historical volatility, as well as a 20-day, 50-day,
|
||||
and even 100-day. In each case, the results are annualized so that one can compare
|
||||
the figures directly.
|
||||
Consider the chart in Figure 36-2. It shows a stock (although it could be a
|
||||
futures contract or index, too) that was meandering in a rather tight range for quite
|
||||
some time. At the point marked "A" on the chart, it was probably at its least volatile.
|
||||
At that time, the 10-dayvolatility might have been something quite low, say 20%. The
|
||||
price movements directly preceding point A had been very small. However, prior to
|
||||
that time the stock had been more volatile, so longer-term measures of the historical
|
||||
volatility would shown higher numbers. The possible measures of historical volatility,
|
||||
then at point A, might have been something like:
|
||||
10-day historical volatility: 20%
|
||||
20-day historical volatility: 23%
|
||||
50-day historical volatility: 35%
|
||||
100-day historical volatility: 45%
|
||||
A pattern of historical volatilities of this sort describes a stock that has been
|
||||
slowing down lately.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user