Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
As AAPL continues to move closer to the 405-strike, it becomes the at-
|
||||
the-money option, with the dominant greeks. The gamma, theta, and vega
|
||||
of the 405 call outweigh those of the ITM 395 call. Vega is more negative.
|
||||
Positive theta now benefits the trade. The net gamma of the spread has
|
||||
turned negative. Because of the negative gamma, the delta has become
|
||||
smaller than it was when the stock was at $400. This means that the benefit
|
||||
of subsequent upward moves in the stock begins to wane. Recall that there
|
||||
is a maximum profit threshold with a vertical spread. As the stock rises
|
||||
beyond $405, negative gamma makes the delta smaller and time decay
|
||||
becomes less beneficial. But at this point, the delta has done its work for the
|
||||
trader who bought this spread when the stock was trading around $395. The
|
||||
average delta on a move in the stock from $395 to $405 is about 0.10 in this
|
||||
case.
|
||||
When the stock is at the 405 strike, the characteristics of the trade are
|
||||
much different than they are when the stock is at the 395 strike. Instead of
|
||||
needing movement upward in the direction of the delta to combat the time
|
||||
decay of the long calls, the position can now sit tight at the short strike and
|
||||
reap the benefits of option decay. The key with this spread, and with all
|
||||
vertical spreads, is that the stock needs to move in the direction of the delta
|
||||
to the short strike.
|
||||
Strengths and Limitations
|
||||
There are many instances when a bull call spread is superior to other bullish
|
||||
strategies, such as a long call, and there are times when it isn’t. Traders
|
||||
must consider both price and time.
|
||||
A bull call spread will always be cheaper than the outright call purchase.
|
||||
That’s because the cost of the long-call portion of the spread is partially
|
||||
offset by the premium of the higher-strike short call. Spending less for the
|
||||
same exposure is always a better choice, but the exposure of the vertical is
|
||||
not exactly the same as that of the long call. The most obvious trade-off is
|
||||
the fact that profit is limited. For smaller moves—up to the price of the
|
||||
short strike—vertical spreads tend to be better trades than outright call
|
||||
purchases. Beyond the strike? Not so much.
|
||||
But time is a trade-off, too. There have been countless times that I have
|
||||
talked with new traders who bought a call because they thought the stock
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user