Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
72 Part II: Call Option Strategies
|
||||
•
|
||||
The covered writer of the January 50 would, at this time, have a small unrealized loss
|
||||
of one point in his overall position: His loss on the common stock is 6 points, but he
|
||||
has a 5-point gain in the January 50 call. (This demonstrates that prior to expiration,
|
||||
a loss occurs at the "break-even" point.) If the stock should continue to fall from
|
||||
these levels, he could have a larger loss at expiration. The call, selling for one point,
|
||||
only affords one more point of downside protection. If a further stock price drop is
|
||||
anticipated, additional downside protection can be obtained by rolling down. In this
|
||||
example, if one were to buy back the January 50 call at 1 and sell the January 45 at
|
||||
4, he would be rolling down. This would increase his protection by another three
|
||||
points - the credit generated by buying the 50 call at 1 and selling the 45 call at 4.
|
||||
Hence, his downside break-even point would be 42 after rolling down.
|
||||
Moreover, if the stock were to remain unchanged - that is, if XYZ were exactly
|
||||
45 at January expiration - the writer would make an additional $300. If he had not
|
||||
rolled down, the most additional income that he could make, if XYZ remained
|
||||
unchanged, would be the remaining $100 from the January 50 call. So rolling down
|
||||
gives more downside protection against a further drop in stock price and may also
|
||||
produce additional income if the stock price stabilizes.
|
||||
In order to more exactly evaluate the overall effect that was obtained by rolling
|
||||
down in this example, one can either compute a profit table (Table 2-21) or draw a
|
||||
net profit graph (Figure 2-3) that compares the original covered write with the
|
||||
rolled-down position.
|
||||
Note that the rolled-down position has a smaller maximum profit potential than
|
||||
the original position did. This is because, by rolling down to a January 45 call, the
|
||||
writer limits his profits anywhere above 45 at expiration. He has committed himself
|
||||
to sell stock 5 points lower than the original position, which utilized a January 50 call
|
||||
and thus had limited profits above 50. Rolling down generally reduces the maximum
|
||||
TABLE 2·21.
|
||||
Profit table.
|
||||
XYZ Price at Profit from Profit from
|
||||
Expiration January 50 Write Rolled Position
|
||||
40 -$500 -200
|
||||
42 - 300 0
|
||||
45 0 +300
|
||||
48 + 300 +300
|
||||
50 + 500 +300
|
||||
60 + 500 +300
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user