Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

training_data/curated/text/0c1cc0738a87f5c2e9cf95c4ae8c93cac88db13faf0f96db0938dfc33246ade3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+O.,ter 3: Call Buying 
+TABLE 3-5. 
+Original and spread positions compared. 
+Stock Price Long Call 
+at Expiration Result 
+25 -$300 
+30 - 300 
+33 - 300 
+35 - 300 
+38 0 
+40 + 200 
+45 + 700 
+FIGURE 3-2. 
+Companion: original call purchase vs. spread. 
+§ 
+~ +$200 
+·5.. 
+~ 
+al 
+tJ) 
+.3 
+0 
+:1: 
+e 
+c.. -$300 
+Stock Price at Expiration 
+Spread 
+Result 
+-$300 
+- 300 
+0 
++ 200 
++ 200 
++ 200 
++ 200 
+115 
+With these prices, a 1-point debit would be required to roll down. That is, selling 2 
+October 35 calls would bring in $300 ($150 each), but the cost of buying the October 
+30 call is $400. Thus, the transaction would have to be done at a cost of $100, plus 
+commissions. With these prices, the break-even point after rolling down would be 34, 
+still well below the original break-even price of 38. The risk has now been increased 
+by the additional 1 point spent to roll down. If XYZ should drop below 30 at October 
+expiration, the investor would have a total loss of 4 points plus commissions. The 
+maximum loss with the original long October 35 call was limited to 3 points plus a 
+smaller amount of commissions. Finally, the maximum amount of money that the