Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

training_data/curated/text/097a19e90b8ca14370bfc4efa2d62ef40e372c6303d5833c1fe9704ec5dd19fb.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+508
+A Complete Guide to the Futures mArket
+tabLe 35.5d profit/Loss Matrix for Long puts with Different Strike prices
+Dollar amount of  premium paid
+$1,350 
+put
+$1,300 
+put
+$1,250 
+put
+$1,200 
+put
+$1,150 
+put
+$1,100 
+put
+$1,050 
+put
+$15,410 $10,870 $6,870 $3,870 $1,990 $1,010 $510
+position profit/Loss at expiration
+Futures price at 
+expiration ($/oz)
+Short Futures 
+at $1,200
+In-the-Money at-the-Money Out-of-the-Money
+$1,350 
+put
+$1,300 
+puta
+$1,250 
+put
+$1,200 
+puta
+$1,150 
+put
+$1,100 
+puta
+$1,050 
+put
+1,000 $20,000 $19,590 $19,130 $18,130 $16,130 $13,010 $8,990 $4,490
+1,050 $15,000 $14,590 $14,130 $13,130 $11,130 $8,010 $3,990 –$510
+1,100 $10,000 $9,590 $9,130 $8,130 $6,130 $3,010 –$1,010 –$510
+1,150 $5,000 $4,590 $4,130 $3,130 $1,130 –$1,990 –$1,010 –$510
+1,200 $0 –$410 –$870 –$1,870 –$3,870 –$1,990 –$1,010 –$510
+1,250 –$5,000 –$5,410 –$5,870 –$6,870 –$3,870 –$1,990 –$1,010 –$510
+1,300 –$10,000 –$10,410 –$10,870 –$6,870 –$3,870 –$1,990 –$1,010 –$510
+1,350 –$15,000 –$15,410 –$10,870 –$6,870 –$3,870 –$1,990 –$1,010 –$510
+1,400 –$20,000 –$15,410 –$10,870 –$6,870 –$3,870 –$1,990 –$1,010 –$510
+aThese puts are compared in Figure 35.5d.
+Figure 35.5d compares the three types of long put positions to a short futures position. It should 
+be noted that in terms of absolute price changes, the short futures position represents the largest 
+position size, while the out-of-the-money put represents the smallest position size. Figure 35.5d sug-
+gests the following important observations:
+ 1. As previously mentioned, the in-the-money put is very similar to an outright short futures 
+position.
+ 2. The out-of-the-money put will lose the least in a rising market, but will also gain the least in a 
+declining market.
+ 3. The at-the-money put will lose the most in a steady market and will be the middle-of-
+the-road performer (relative to the other two types of puts) in declining and advancing 
+markets.
+Again, it should be emphasized that these comparisons are based on single-unit positions that 
+may differ substantially in terms of their implied position size (as suggested by their respective delta 
+values). A comparison that involved equivalent position size levels for each strategy (i.e., equal delta 
+values for each position) would yield different observations.